The only reason we get away with giving such large doses of epinephrine to these patients is that they are already dead.

- Rogue Medic

Update on – Is it OK to kill children in the name of God?

 

Back in April, I wrote this about the death of the second of the Schaible’s children at the hands of a pastor –
 

Don’t bother using alternative medicine to make a limb to grow back. Take alternative medicine for things that occasionally resolve without any real medicine.

Then claim “Alternative” medicine did it!

Is it OK to kill children in the name of alternative medicine?[1]

 

I am feeling much more prophetic than Sylvia Browne at the moment, but everyone should always feel more prophetic than that fraud.[2]

The other trait of alternative medicine is to blame the patient (in this case, the family) for a lack of faith, when the scam fails.
 

Clark was the spiritual adviser when the Schaibles’ 2-year-old, Kent, died from bacterial pneumonia in 2009, which led to a manslaughter conviction and probation for the couple. And he ministered to them last week when 8-month-old Brandon died, a case now being investigated by police.

In an interview with The Inquirer, Clark said God did not want the Schaible children to die.

Instead, he said, the children died because of some “spiritual lack” in the Schaibles’ lives – a flaw they need to correct to prevent future deaths.[3]

 

The problem is not with the person selling the scam, but with the people not believing enough.

The Schaibles made the mistake of listening to Pastor Nelson Clark and they killed one of their sons with untreated pneumonia.

The Schaibles then made the even bigger mistake of listening to Pastor Nelson Clark again and they killed a second one of their sons with untreated pneumonia.

Pastor Nelson Clark blames the parents and maybe the dead children.

I blame the parents, but not as much as I blame Pastor Nelson Clark.
 


Image credit. Pastor Nelson Clark of the First Century Gospel Church.
 

This human sacrifice is

not the first time that children have died with the help of Pastor Nelson Clark

not the second time that children have died with the help of Pastor Nelson Clark

not the third time that children have died with the help of Pastor Nelson Clark

not the fourth time that children have died with the help of Pastor Nelson Clark
 

The First Century Gospel Church of Philadelphia’s teachings has clashed with authorities in the past.

In 1991, eight children died in a measles epidemic. All the parents were members of either First Century Gospel Church or the nearby Faith Tabernacle of Nicetown which also preaches faith-healing.[4]

 

Let’s just say that Pastor Nelson Clark doesn’t have a good record of praying the germs away.

Keep the Schaibles from being in any position to care for any children – ever.

More important is to stop Pastor Nelson Clark from using the children of his congregation to demonstrate that seriously ill children will die without medicine – even with the wonders of modern sanitation. His God apparently approves of sanitation, and automobiles, but not seat belts. Made Up Biblical References 4:20.

Pneumonia is regularly treated successfully by real doctors, especially when recognized early –
 

The majority of children diagnosed with pneumonia in the outpatient setting are treated with oral antibiotics. High-dose amoxicillin is used as a first-line agent for children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. Second- or third-generation cephalosporins and macrolide antibiotics such as azithromycin are acceptable alternatives. Combination therapy (ampicillin and either gentamicin or cefotaxime) is typically used in the initial treatment of newborns and young infants.[5]

 

Pastor Nelson Clark wants to gamble with the lives of your children. If you lose, he blames you.

Are you willing to bet the lives of your children?

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] Is it OK to kill children in the name of God?
Sat, 27 Apr 2013
Rogue Medic
Article

-

[2] Why Do We Treat Some Frauds Differently?
Sat, 11 May 2013
Rogue Medic
Article

-

[3] Pastor: ‘Spiritual lack’ killed two boys
By Mike Newall, Inquirer Staff Writer
Posted: April 29, 2013
Philly.com
Article

-

[4] Faith-healing parents charged with MURDER after second child died in their home from pneumonia without getting medical help while they were on probation over death of first son
By Daily Mail Reporter
Published: 17:10 EST, 22 May 2013 | Updated: 17:33 EST, 22 May 2013
Capital Bay
Article

-

[5] Pediatric Pneumonia
Author: Nicholas John Bennett, MB, BCh, PhD; Chief Editor: Russell W Steele, MD
Medscape Reference
Article

.

Why Do We Treat Some Frauds Differently?

 

Sylvia Browne is receiving some deservedly bad press for the exposure of her psychic deception.
 

In 2004, the year following the then 16-year-old schoolgirl’s disappearance, Browne appeared on “The Montel Williams” show and told Berry’s distraught mother Louwana Miller – who died from heart failure a year later – that her daughter was “in heaven and on the other side” and that her last words were “goodbye, mom, I love you.”[1]

 

Should anyone be surprised?

But where’s the harm?

Psychics make their living by exploiting our selective memories.

We remember the hits, but forget the misses.

If I throw out as many guesses as I can, some of them are bound to be right.

Should I tell you I have the ability to see the future, or communicate with the dead?

This is not a psychic power.

This is deceit.
 


 

Jeffrey Skilling is trying to get a sentence reduction for his part in the disaster that was Enron. Fraud? Mismanagement? The Secret?

 

He spoke haltingly, stopping in mid-sentence. “In terms of remorse, Your Honor, I can’t imagine more remorse,” he said. He had “friends who have died, good men.” He was innocent—”innocent of every one of these charges.” He spoke for two or three minutes and sat down.[2]

 

Malcolm Gladwell provides a good argument that what Jeffrey Skilling did was not an intentional fraud. It was complicated. It was not hidden. Maybe Skilling was a more of a true believer than a fraud.

He apparently believed that the problem was that the employees were not willing to do what was necessary to make the company grow at an unsustainable pace. He should be able to demand results and it is their fault if they cannot deliver. Why let reality get in the way of a perfectly good plan?

The Enron financial statements were examined two years before the peak using the information that was available at the time.
 

The students’ conclusions were straightforward. Enron was pursuing a far riskier strategy than its competitors. There were clear signs that “Enron may be manipulating its earnings.” The stock was then at forty-eight —at its peak, two years later, it was almost double that—but the students found it over-valued. The report was posted on the Web site of the Cornell University business school, where it has been, ever since, for anyone who cared to read twenty-three pages of analysis. The students’ recommendation was on the first page, in boldfaced type: “Sell.”[2]

 

We don’t want to know the truth. If you had shorted Enron at the time, you probably would have lost a lot of money and had to cover your losses before Enron dropped to its actual value – less than nothing. Enron’s debts were much greater than its assets.

Psychics depend on this gullibility, too.

This is beyond your understanding.

It is arrogant to question what I am doing.

John Edward also scam the bereived and he had the backing of America’s favorite scam promoter – Dr. Mehmet Oz.
 

In a letter to producers of “The Dr. Oz” show Nordal said, “I provided very balanced responses to Dr. Oz’s questions during the show’s taping, however, the editing of my responses did not capture my full comments or give viewers an accurate portrayal of my professional view on John Edward’s methods. Instead, it seems that ‘The Doctor Oz’ show intentionally edited my responses in a way that gave the appearance of my endorsement of Edward’s methods as a legitimate intervention.”[3]

 

Dr. Oz is as bad as John Edward and Sylvia Browne. He is promoting stuff that a child should realize is nonsense.[4]

People trust him, even though he promotes frauds.

How is Sylvia Browne any better than Jeffrey Skilling?

How is John Edward any better than Jeffrey Skilling?

How is Dr. Mehmet Oz any better than Jeffrey Skilling?
 

The Pigasus Award for Refusal to Face Reality goes to Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Harvard-trained cardiologist who hosts The Dr. Oz Show on broadcast television, one of the most popular syndicated television shows in America. The only person to have won a Pigasus Award two years in a row, he wins a third time this year for his continued promotion of quack medical practices, paranormal belief and pseudoscience, including pseudoscientific Reparative Therapy to “cure” gay people, the “energy-healing practice” of Reiki as a way to cure disease, various TV psychics and mediums such as Theresa Caputo and John Edward, faith healers such as “John of God,” GMO conspiracy theories, and any number of new quack diets, herbal remedies, anti-aging cures, and untested “wonder drugs,” among many other pseudoscientific and paranormal claims.[5]

 

Harry Houdini is reported to have stated –

It is not for us to prove the mediums are dishonest, it is for them to prove that they are honest.

Houdini spent years exposing the fraudulent methods of the psychics of his day.

We still believe in magic.

The reason we seem to treat this fraud as something other than fraud is that we act like we know what is best for the people we know who are gullible.

We assist in the fraud.

We lie to people to make us feel that we are helping their grief.

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] Celebrity psychic Sylvia Browne hit for telling mom of Amanda Berry she was dead
By Hollie McKay
Published May 09, 2013
FoxNews.com
Article

-

[2] Open Secrets Enron, intelligence, and the perils of too much information.
The New Yorker
January 8, 2007
Malcolm Gladwell
Article

-

[3] TV Skeptic: The medium and Oz
March 18, 2011 | 2:05 pm
LA Times
Article

-

[4] The trouble with Dr. Oz
David Gorski
Science-Based Medicine
April 26, 2011
Article

-

[5] JREF’s Pigasus Awards “Honors” Dubious Peddlers of “Woo” (VIDEO)
Latest JREF News
James Randi Educational Foundation
Article with video

.

Anti-Vaccine Legislator Trying to Raise the Cost of Vaccines

 

Representative Andrea Boland is trying to make it harder to vaccinate children.

Why?

She appears to be just another scientifically illiterate person who thinks that chemical names are scary, even though there is no medical justification for her alarmist bill.

Vaccines are probably the safest and most effective medicines we have.

 

Image credit.
 

The measure, LD 754, sponsored by Democratic Rep. Andrea Boland, ran into stiff opposition from doctors, who said that requiring ingredients be disclosed specifically for vaccines — while not imposing similar requirements for antibiotics and prescription drugs — would signal that vaccines are disproportionately dangerous.[1]

 

Is anyone trying to hide the ingredients of vaccines?

Absolutely not.

The ingredients for every vaccine are available, but before you start making the mistake of assuming that scary sounding names are dangerous, take less than 4 minutes to watch the video below.
 


Download Video from YouTube | Convert YouTube to MP3
 

Why only the ingredients of vaccines?

To make them seem scary.

In case you think that Rep. Boland is trustworthy, here is what she says about vaccine safety.

 

“When you read some of [the ingredients], it does sound kind of scary. The provider is there to counsel their patients, and they can assure them that they will not have any serious side effects and it’s the best thing to do.”[1]

 

It’s the best thing to do.
 

If vaccination is the best thing to do, why create obstacles to vaccination?

Is Rep. Bolton trying to push some sort of hidden agenda?

Here is the information provided on her government web page.

 

Occupation: Self-Employed Title Examiner; Independent Nutraceutical Distributor[2]

 

Rep. Bolton appears to be letting her personal nutraceutical business interests get between her and what is best for the children she is supposed to represent.

If you have a bit more time than the less than 4 minutes it took to watch the video, then listen to a 33 1/2 minute podcast, where Dr. Mark Crislip explains what is wrong with a silly claim by a naturopath.[2] “9 Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims.” by David Mihalovic, ND. Really?

If you believe that vaccines are dangerous, then you need to listen to this podcast.

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] Sanford lawmaker wants doctors to disclose vaccine ingredients
By Matthew Stone, BDN Staff
Posted April 29, 2013, at 3:27 p.m.
Bangor Daily News
Article

-

[2] QuackCast 44. Nine questions.
Dr. Mark Crislip
Quackcast
Nine questions, none answers. An ND suggests there are 9 questions that pro-vaccine proponents can’t answer. Ha. My 12 year old can find the answers.
Podcast in mp3 format – click to play or right click and save to download.
 

QuackCast 44. Nine questions, none answers. An ND suggests there are 9 questions that pro-vaccine proponents can’t answer. Ha. My 12 year old can find the answers.

 

The print version, with links to the referenced research, is at the link below.

Nine Questions, Nine Answers.
Published by Mark Crislip
May 07, 2010
Science-Based Medicine
Article

.

Is it OK to kill children in the name of God?

 

Don’t bother using alternative medicine to make a limb to grow back. Take alternative medicine for things that occasionally resolve without any real medicine.

Then claim “Alternative” medicine did it!

Is it OK to kill children in the name of alternative medicine?
 

Change that just a little bit and it should be obvious that these people are dangerous.

Don’t bother praying to make a limb to grow back. Pray for things that occasionally resolve without any medicine.

Then claim God did it!

Is it OK to kill children in the name of God?
 

 

A Philadelphia couple violated probation after their second child died as a result of them turning to prayer instead of seeking a doctor when the child was ill.[1]

 

Would these children have lived if they had been treated with real medicine?

Only a fraud will tell you that they are certain about the outcome if something had been done differently, but there is evidence that real medicine works. There is no evidence that alternative medicine works. There is no evidence that prayer works.

Is it in any way acceptable to have children sacrificed to these religions of homeopathy, Reiki, anti-vaccinationism, prayer, chiropractic, or other placebo treatments?

How were they sacrificed?

Any reasonable person would seek medical care for a child if the child is sick.

Two children, so sick that they died, were not provided with any visit to a doctor.

Herbert and Catherine Schaible are already on probation for the involuntary manslaughter of the first child they neglected to death.

Only 2 years into a 10 year sentence of probation and they miraculously have another dead child with no sign of any reasonable attempt to protect their 8-month-old son, Brandon Schaible.
 

When a judge sentenced Herbert and Catherine Schaible to probation in 2011 for praying over their gravely ill toddler son instead of taking him to a doctor, Herbert Schaible offered a few brief words of remorse and grief, then entrusted his family’s fate to a higher power.

“With God’s help, this will never happen again,” Schaible told the court.[2]

 

They fell off the wagon pretty quickly.

Why didn’t they seek real medical attention for their sick child on the first day, or the second day, or at any other time before they brough him to the funeral home?
 

“Because we believe God wants us to ask him for healing,” Lerner quoted from the statements. “Our religion tells us not to call a doctor.”[2]

 

Third time is the charm, right?
 

The couple has seven more children that were removed from the Schaibles’ home by the Department of Human Services.[1]

 

The government is not known for doing a great job of raising children, but this is clearly a case where being raised by wolves might be better for the children.
 

Consider some other ways that prayer might be used and whether any of us would be foolish enough to rely on these –

I won’t work, I’ll just pray for money to be put in my bank account.

I won’t cook, I’ll just pray for food to be prepared for me.

I won’t clean, I’ll just pray for everything to be cleaned for me.
 

Real medicine can reattach limbs and attach artificial limbs.

Amputees are still waiting for the first amputee is cured by prayer.

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] Second Child Of Philadelphia Couple Dies After They Choose Prayer Instead Of Seeing A Doctor
By Charles Poladian
April 23 2013 10:05 AM
International Business Times
Article

-

[2] A second child of doctor-shunning couple dies
By Mike Newall, Inquirer Staff Writer
Posted: April 23, 2013
philly.com
Article

.

An important new blog opposing fraud in medicine – EdzardErnst.com

-

We have too much fraud and irresponsibility in medicine. Not all of what is criticized is fraud, because the people pushing these treatments may just be ignorantly promoting treatments that have no good evidence to support them.

The people claiming that a treatments works because there is no proof that the treatment is harmful are abusing their responsibility to their patients.

Is there an important distinction between this irresponsible abuse of patients and fraud?

One is intentionally misleading others, while the other is first misleading himself, so that he can honestly present nonsense as something he believes in.
 


 

Dr. Edzard Ernst is an alternative medicine doctor who wanted to know what really worked in alternative medicine, but could not find any good evidence. He designed some research to find out what really works.

As a good scientist, when the results of the research did not provide the answers he wanted, he changed his mind and he published the negative results.
 

In a nutshell, I am not someone who judges alternative medicine from the outside; I come from within the field. Arguably, I am the only researcher in this area who is willing [or capable?] to state publicly what is wrong with alternative medicine. This is perhaps one of the advantages of being an emeritus professor![1]

 

But is Dr. Ernst completely dismissive of alternative medicine?
 

People who criticise alternative medicine tend to claim that all of it is unscientific rubbish which we should discard. However, I am not convinced that this opinion is correct. I aim to adhere to the principles of evidence-based medicine and know that they can be applied to alternative medicine as much as to any other area of healthcare. This means that I will not dismiss everything that comes under the umbrella of alternative medicine. Our research has shown some treatments to work for some conditions, and where this is the case, I will always say so.[1]

 

I use a more inclusive definition of alternative medicine. I include the nonsense that is claimed to be part of real medicine, but is not supported by good medicine.

Look at ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support).

ACLS is primarily about resuscitation from cardiac arrest, which is much more than just temporarily getting a pulse back.

ACLS is primarily about survival to go home with a brain that still works.

ACLS treatments that are included in the resuscitation guidelines are –

Chest compressions – Good evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Defibrillation – Good evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.
 

Unfortunately, ACLS does not stop with treatments that work. The following are also included –

Ventilations – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Epinephrine – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Vasopressin – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Phenylephrine – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Norepinephrine – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Amiodarone – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Lidocaine – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Magnesium – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest.

Atropine – No evidence of improved survival from cardiac arrest. Removed in 2010 due to a lack of evidence, even though the rest of the treatments remain, for now.
 

I don’t criticize alternative medicine because it is an easy target, but because of the similarities with the dangerous parts of real medicine.

If we don’t learn from our mistakes, our patients pay for our arrogance.
 

What follows is, I think, quite simple: this blog will differ from other blogs on the subject. It will provide critical evaluation because, in my view, this is what is needed. But it will not engage in wholesale alternative medicine-bashing. Most importantly, it will provide comments and perspectives that are based on many years of conducting and publishing research in this area.[1]

 

While I do engage in wholesale bashing of alternative medicine, I do ask for people to produce valid evidence that the treatments they are pushing are safe and efficacious. Without evidence, the treatment is nonsense.

With ACLS, I take a similar approach.

There is a lot of nonsense in ACLS, but not all of ACLS is nonsense, and ACLS seems to be improving. These abuses from ACLS are only some examples of the failure of real medicine to grow up and eliminate wishful thinking from medicine.

If we care about our patients, we should not abuse them with nonsense.

If we care about our patients, we need to know that the treatments we give are more likely to provide benefit than harm.

Without evidence, we are ignorant of benefit (if any) and harm (how much harm).

Everything can cause harm, but not everything can cause benefit.

Too many of us mistakenly assume that it is appropriate to demand evidence of harm, but inappropriate to demand evidence of benefit. This is just treatment by logical fallacy.[2]

Our patients deserve more intelligent and more ethical treatment than that.
 

Go read what Dr. Ernst writes.
 

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] A New Blog on Alternative Medicine. Why?
Published Sunday 14 October 2012
EdzardErnst.com
Article

-

[2] Argument from ignorance
Wikipedia
Article
 

Argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam or “appeal to ignorance” (where “ignorance” stands for: “lack of evidence to the contrary”), is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is “generally accepted” (or vice versa).

 

.

This Friday the 13th Don’t Let Homeopathy Cross Your Mind

-

It is Homeopathy Awareness Week.

 

Homeopathy Week!

-

This is a whole week devoted to nothing.

Not just nothing, but nothing diluted to be less than nothing! With some magical tapping thrown in as part of the sales pitch.

Homeopathy is a magical belief system that is just as valid as anything children make up when they are playing with imaginary friends – and just as unencumbered by evidence.

And following the advice of homeopaths can kill you if you have a real illness, rather than a cold, or some anxiety, or gullibility.

One Example Of Why Treatments Without Evidence Are Dangerous.

.

From the desk of the Grand Wizard of the American Coven of Homeopaths.

CC: Oprah Winfrey, Dr. Jay Gordon, Jenny McCarthy, Deepak Choprah, Sylvia Browne, John Edwards, Dr. (for as long as it lasts) Andrew Wakefield, Dr. et cetera.

Top secret.

Not for distribution.

We will put a hex on you.

A real bad hex, not a weenie homeopathic hex.

For Homeopathy Awareness Week we do have to make you aware of some things:

Due to the recent developments with Zicam[1] and the problems with the British Chioropractic Association and their inability to keep their minions in line,[2] we need to warn you about some problems. Nothing that can’t be fixed with smoke, mirrors, misdirection, and the usual stupid arguments that still seem to confuse otherwise intelligent dupes.

Sometimes the medication we sell to the public is safe to take, but only as long as our victims patients do not avoid conventional medical treatment. As you know, this is because there is nothing active in the homeopathic medication.

Other times we just pretend to sell the public that holy water, but we put real medication in there so that there is some effect other than the placebo effect. We use this loop hole so that we do not have to meet the FDA requirements for real medication, while we pretend to be selling distilled water.

Since both of these approaches are completely dishonest, we will never tell our victims patients whether they are getting violated treated with an active fraud or an inactive fraud.

Most important we must convince people that the reason the fake homeopathy Zicam causes them to lose their sense of smell is not because real homeopathy stinks. I don’t know where they would get that idea.

Be very careful discussing this with anyone who might have a shred of integrity. We believe that we have diluted integrity to a 1 google C level in our organization, but integrity is so foreign to us that we may not recognize integrity when confronted with the genuine article.

Honesty is the enemy. All truth is a lie. We only hurt people because it is the quickest way to their money we love them.

This is big business. The real drug companies only wish they could make up whatever BS they want, but real drug companies have real oversight. We just answer to Satan.

MwaHaHaHaHa!


Our victims patients need to be lied to.

Our victims patients do not get to choose the lie they receive.

That’s just tough love, homeopathy style.

It’s good to be the Grand Wizard, baby!

Dictated by Baal, Grand Wizard of the American Coven of Homeopaths, for distribution to all active minions and executives of commercial partners.

-


Download Video from YouTube | Convert YouTube to MP3

-

mp3 Download of QuackCast 3.
Homeopathic Theory. Of all the kinds of alt.med available, Homeopathy has to be the most absurd. And thats saying something. Listen and see why. 5/7/06 By winner of many podcasting awards – Dr. Mark Crislip.

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] FDA Advises Consumers Not To Use Certain Zicam Cold Remedies
Intranasal Zinc Product Linked to Loss of Sense of Smell

FDA
June 16, 2009
Press Release

[2] McTimoney Chiropractors told to take down their web sites
The Quackometer
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Top Secret Warning

This is not part of the silliness. This is a real warning sent out by real quacks.

.

One Example Of Why Treatments Without Evidence Are Dangerous

-

Homeopathy is just a fancy way of selling placebos.

Pure deception.

Dilution to remove the possibility of any medical benefit.

That just makes it harmless, right?

Wrong.

Magical thinking is not harmless.

Magical thinking kills.

Wishful thinking kills.

-

It was further contended that the homeopath had assured the deceased that she could cure rectal cancer using homeopathic methods alone and that the deceased would not require surgery, chemotherapy or radiation treatment.[1]

That fraud homeopath is Francine Scrayen.

-

-

Further it was contented that the homeopath had encouraged the deceased not to take appropriate pain relief on the basis that relevant medications would interfere with her monitoring of the disease and the effectiveness of the homeopathic treatment.[1]

As much as I would like to be able to say that real doctors would not do this, I know that there are a lot of doctors who are horrible at pain management.

-

It was claimed that it was only as a result of a graphic description of the circumstances in which the deceased would die within hours given by the registrar at the hospital which caused the deceased to finally agree to surgery in spite of the advice of the homeopath. Unfortunately the cancer by that time spread to her liver, lungs and bones and treatment from time onwards was effectively palliative.[1]

By delaying the patient from accepting real treatment, Francine Scrayen essentially killed Penelope Dingle. All while billing the patient for medical care.

There were repeated cases of bloody stools from October 2001 right up until the diagnosis of cancer. Had she been seen by some medical professional in that time, she might have been diagnosed at a much earlier stage of her cancer. Homeopathy does not work that way.

-

Quoted in the inquest from a letter intended to be sent to the homeopath by the patient.

You waited about 12 months, trying to treat, before you suggested I have my internal bleeding diagnosed.

I have since learned that any sort of internal bleeding must be investigated immediately, as it can be a sign that something is seriously wrong. As an alternative health practitioner you should have known this and acted accordingly.[1]

Oops :oops:

-

In other words, it was the contention of the siblings of the deceased that the deceased made a number of unfortunate decisions based on misleading and erroneous information and advice provided to her by a homeopath and those decisions ultimately resulted in her premature death.[1]

Yes, she did make some bad decisions, but the coercion involved was extreme.

-

Each time Mrs Hearne questioned her sister she was told that Mrs Scrayen claimed that she was at the turning point of her illness and would now be getting better.[1]

Ignore reality.

You really are getting better. Just ignore the obvious signs that you are progressively getting worse.

This is the medical advice of the fraud homeopath Francine Scrayen, according to the inquest, she appears to be a modern Rasputin.

-

While Mrs Chappell stayed at the home of the deceased and Dr Dingle, every night the deceased was screaming in pain12. [1]

On that occasion she questioned Mrs Scrayen about the deceased’s level of pain and Mrs Scrayen replied to the effect that “…most of Penelope’s pain was in her head and she exaggerated her pain and that she was quite dramatic about it”16. [1]

That cancer pain is just in your head. Stop whining, because the lack of positive thinking is the real problem. The problem is not that homeopathy is a complete fraud.

-

The problem in this case was that Mrs Scrayen was not a competent health professional.[1]

That is exactly the point. Homeopaths are not competent health professionals. They are placebo pushers.

This homeopath has taken legal action against the author of one blog for reporting on this case.[2] It is all about the reputation, not about the patients. This is why I continually criticize those of us in EMS who pay more attention to appearances, than to our patients.

 

Demanding evidence of benefit is the best way to protect our patients from quackery.

 

The evidence makes it clear that Homeopathy is only a placebo – a fraud.

-

Footnotes:

-

[1] Penelope Dingle Inquest
Western Australia
Inquest into the death of Penelope DINGLE
Ref No: 17/10
Perth Coroners Court on 9-24 June 2010
Record of inquest in PDF format

-

[2] Francine Scrayen sends me a Cease and Desist.
Thursday, April 5, 2012 at 4:47PM
Dan’s Journal of Skepticism
Article

.

Getting Our Panties in a Bunch Over Being Called Ambulance Drivers

-

A lot of people are taking sides on the topic of just how disrespectful it is to be called an ambulance driver.

We demand respect, even though we don’t deserve respect.

Anyone who cares about respect does not deserve respect.

Any idiot can demand respect. A lot of idiots do.

Respect my politics. Respect my religion. Respect my job description. Respect my favorite TV show. Respect my hair style. . . . .

Certainly, we are not demanding respect for our maturity, because all of this preening and posturing is not remotely mature. We are no more mature than toddlers misbehaving in order to get attention.

My. My. My. My. My.

Mine. Mine. Mine. Mine. Mine.

Not a big difference.

-


Image credit.

-

Respect is earned.

Respect that is demanded at the point of a tantrum is just condescension to the person demanding respect. In what way is that respect? In what way is that worthy of any respect? This is just demanding that people be condescending to us.

 

To convince me that you do NOT deserve respect – demand respect.

 

When we demand respect, we are demonstrating that our priorities are completely screwed up.

In EMS, we can earn respect by demonstrating excellence at what we do.

Or we can make a mockery of what we do by worrying about respect.

-

Other writing on this –

R-E-S-P-E-C-T
Rogue Medic
Fri, 26 Mar 2010
Article

-

R-E-S-P-E-C-T
A Day In the Life of An Ambulance Driver
March 24, 2010
Article

-

“Respect”
The Handover at Life Under the Lights
March 31, 2010
Article

-

Why Johnny Ringo, I’ll Be Your Ambulance Driver
The Social Medic
February 22, 2012
Article

-

There are no “Ambulance Drivers” in Emergent Medical Services
EMS Outside Agitator
February 22, 2012
Article

-

Respect: Earned, Never Given.
Coma Toast
February 16, 2012
Article

-

I am NOT an Ambulance Driver
Medic 51
February 22, 2012
Article

-

Get over yourselves, drivers
Captain Chair Confessions
February 20, 2012
Article

-

Irritating people is what I do best
Captain Chair Confessions
February 21, 201
Article

.