It appears that bad management tolerated, and promoted, bad patient care – right up until it affected one of their own. Now the residents have to pay a lot of money for this failure of oversight.
How typical is this medic?
Throughout the litigation, Tate denied any wrongdoing. He maintained his work behavior was part of the “culture” of the Fire Department.
The AFD (Albuquerque Fire Department) disagrees and convinced at least one “hearing officer” that it is only because the rest of the paramedics are better than Tate that his patients did not have worse outcomes.
Does that make any sense?
I discussed the complaints at the time of an earlier article about Tate and AFD.
If you work with a dangerous paramedic, and you do not report any problems, does that make you better than the problem paramedic?
How does such a dangerous paramedic get promoted to lieutenant?
Is it likely that competent management remained unaware of these problems for a decade, or that this was a sudden onset of an unprecedented problem, or that in some other way this is not an example of bad management?
Other organizations have had to deal with criticism after their management of the corruption was exposed –
The Vatican revealed Tuesday that over the past decade, it has defrocked 848 priests who raped or molested children and sanctioned another 2,572 with lesser penalties, providing the first ever breakdown of how it handled the more than 3,400 cases of abuse reported to the Holy See since 2004.
For hundreds of years we have been told that priests don’t rape children, because they are more moral than the rest of us. Evidence has demonstrated otherwise, but the corrupt culture still discourages reporting these crimes to the police.
Is there some reason to believe that Tate is just one rotten apple?
This appears to be another example of a corrupt culture, that will end up costing a lot more money and setting bad standards of care.
Are the patients surviving to the emergency department because of the care provided or just because most people will survive what EMS does to them?
Cadigan told the Journal in 2014 that he was confident Tate would be “vindicated when he has a neutral judge to review the city’s unfair and arbitrary action. The taxpayers will likely have to pick up the tab for this absurd witch hunt.”
Vindicated for treating the family of a fellow AFD lieutenant the same way he would treat other patients?
Tate claimed his conduct was consistent with what he learned at the Fire Department and argued that even if he did commit the alleged acts, he should be given corrective training.
Maybe Tate did receive corrective training.
Repeated reminders to fit in with the culture is how corruption works.
If the culture is not the problem, why did an investigation only begin after a complaint about Tate treating one of his own the same way he is reported to treat other patients?
 Vatican says it’s punished over 3,400 priests since ’04 for raping or molesting children
The Associated Press
Published: 06 May 2014 03:56 PM
Updated: 06 May 2014 04:04 PM
The Dallas Morning News