Picture credit[1]
Does looking at that picture make you just want to surrender and hand the controls of an airliner to a terrorist?
3 inches long.
Plastic.
No moving parts.
Not even a trigger.
But it is a replica gun, so it was banned from a flight, not by the American TSA (Transportation Security Agency), but by the British security people at Gatwick Airport.
It is true that a replica can be used to hijack a plane, but is anyone going to surrender a plane to an attempted terrorist brandishing a miniature replica?
Would it even be possible to brandish a miniature replica gun?
brandish
verb
[with object]wave or flourish (something, especially a weapon) as a threat or in anger or excitement[2]
Perhaps the attempted terrorist could threaten people with the miniature replica, but would the greater threat be from violence or laughter?
–
[youtube]4bCyIAsSid8[/youtube]
–
When we have people mindlessly enforcing rules just because they are too afraid to think, aren’t these mindless rules gnomes more dangerous than the terrorists they are supposed to be protecting us from?
Mrs Lloyd, 59, who regularly visits Britain to see her mother, said: ‘I took it to the airport still in its wrapping, but they discovered the little gun when it was scanned.
‘It is only about three inches long and there are no moving parts. There isn’t even a trigger.
‘But they wouldn’t let me take it with me. I had it in my hand luggage. I just didn’t think it would cause a problem. They said rules were rules. There was no flexibility or common sense.’[1]
We need to insist that this kind of person, who follows rules without thinking, be prohibited from enforcing any rules.
The stupid may be much more dangerous than the malicious.
She had bought the figure on a visit to the Royal Signals Museum, in Blandford, Dorset.
Museum spokesman Adam Forty said: ‘This is a military museum and takes security very seriously, especially around military installations and airports, but this does seem more than a little excessive. The “firearm” is three inches long and cast out of resin.
‘It’s probably just as well we didn’t sell her a toy tank.’[1]
One odd thing is that this happened a while ago, but coverage just started.
The story appears to have been a long-time in the making.
The National Post of Toronto writes “Ms. Lloyd purchased the figuring during an April, 2009, trip, but the story is making news now because the Royal Signals Museum at Blandford Camp …, where she bought the souvenir, went public with the story after learning about it from Ms. Lloyd this past autumn.[3]
–
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. – Benjamin Franklin
What about those who prohibit responsibility and/or prohibit thinking?
What punishment do they deserve?
What punishment do their willing victims deserve?
Just give us the illusion of safety, but don’t make us think!
–
Footnotes:
–
[1] Airport bans toy soldier’s three-inch rifle from plane… because it’s a safety threat
Daily Mail
Last updated at 8:54 PM on 27th January 2011
Article
–
[2] brandish
Oxford Dictionaries
Definition
–
[3] Three-inch toy gun sparks security flap at London Gatwick
By Ben Mutzabaugh
USA Today
Posted Jan 28 2011 9:56AM
.
Subscribe to RogueMedic.com