Without evidence of benefit, an intervention should not be presumed to be beneficial or safe.

- Rogue Medic

Deja vu all over again in segregation


I was just a little kid when Alabama Governor George Wallace gave his famous inauguration speech announcing segregation now, segregation tomorrow, and segregation forever.[1] I had hoped that we, in America, had matured and improved our morality in the last half century.


Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore wants to prove that segregation, and other immoral acts, still get votes in Alabama.[2] The Alabama Supreme Court is elected and today the Chief Justice demonstrated that he will continue to pander to the immorality of voters. He was removed from office in 2003 for idolatry, but the voters support idolatry – as long as it is their version of the golden calf. Because tradition has arbitrarily limited the rights of some Americans, some Americans think that immoral tradition should continue.

These defenders of immorality claim that they are defending Biblical marriage. With so many forms of God-endorsed Biblical marriage, why do they defend only one form? Why not the polygamy that God approved of in the Bible? Why not the selling of a daughter into sexual slavery that God approved of in the Bible? Why do they leave out the parts of the Bible that they find embarrassing?

7 “If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to [a]go free as the male slaves [b]do. 8 If she is [c]displeasing in the eyes of her master [d]who designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He does not have authority to sell her to a foreign people because of his [e]unfairness to her. 9 If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her according to the custom of daughters. 10 If he takes to himself another woman, he may not reduce her [f]food, her clothing, or her conjugal rights. 11 If he will not do these three things for her, then she shall go out for nothing, without payment of money. Exodus 21:7-11[3]


What about all of the other forms of Biblical marriage that the God of the Bible endorses?

biblical marriages
Image credit.

Fortunately, we live in America, so these examples of Biblical immorality are prohibited.

Justifications of slavery are rooted in the Bible and an economic system that is so obscene that it is used as a metaphor for other, less bad economic systems, such as communism and Nazism. We had to defend America against a rebellion by those who wanted to expand slavery. It took half a million deaths in a war to end this Biblical immorality.

Justifications of laws prohibiting contraception are rooted in the Bible. Struck down by the American Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965.[4]

Justifications of laws prohibiting interracial marriage are rooted in the Bible. Struck down by the American Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia in 1967.[5]

Justifications of laws prohibiting marriage equality are rooted in the Bible. Struck down by the American Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015.[6]

To paraphrase what has been written elsewhere, The fact that I can no longer sell my daughter as a sex slave means that we have already redefined marriage. It is just one of many parts of eternal and unchanging laws of the God of the Bible that are illegal in civilized countries.

On the other hand, maybe these Christians are right. Maybe we should return to Biblical marriage. I don’t make much money as a paramedic and my daughter got her looks from her mother. The bidding starts at . . . well, make me an offer. It is the moral thing to do, according to the Bible.

When will we stop listening to Bible thumpers promoting immorality in the name of their interpretation of their Bible?

The American Constitution is in conflict with the Bible, because the Founding Fathers were more interested in fair play than in promoting persecution by the religious. The Founding Fathers could have limited the vote (and political office) to Protestants, but they explicitly forbade such discrimination.[7]

So many of these segregationists claim to disapprove of big government, but demand a big government to enforce their rules of watered down sharia. Hypocrisy seems to be required to defend such blatant immorality.


[1] George Wallace’s 1963 Inaugural Address

[2] The Quixotic Adventures of Roy Moore – Alabama’s chief justice issued an order on Wednesday to keep the state’s same-sex marriage ban intact despite the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling last year.
The Atlantic
Matt Ford
5:15 PM ET

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore issued an administrative order Wednesday that effectively banned same-sex marriages in the state, less than seven months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage bans violated the Constitution.


[3] Exodus 21:7-11
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Bible Gateway – A Christian site that allows you to use any other version if you like.
Link to these holy words of the God of the Bible

[4] Griswold v. Connecticut
U.S. Supreme Court
Decided: June 7, 1965

[5] Loving v. Virginia
U.S. Supreme Court
Decided: June 12, 1967
Cornell University Law School

[6] Obergefell v. Hodges
U.S. Supreme Court
Decided: June 26 2015

[7] Article VI Section 3
U.S. Constitution

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.


Highlighting is mine.



  1. Drop that mic! It’s all a symptom of our species. You’ve said it over and over on this site and elsewhere. Even in the face of overwhelming and conversely underwhelming evidence, humans will dance to their own tunes even if it’s over a cliff or into a warm bath. Go figure. Il nous faut continuer à lutter !

  2. Your lack of knowledge of the bible is breathtaking. You have no idea how to read it, or understand it. What this has to do with EMS is beyond me. Well, enjoy your hate and loathing.

    • What part of what I wrote do you disagree with?

      If you are going to accuse me of a breathtaking lack of knowledge of the Bible, you do need to provide evidence.

      This is not just an EMS site, but ethics will always be a part of EMS, so your failure to understand that is disappointing.

      Feel free to provide some evidence to support your claims that I am expressing hate and loathing.

      Provide evidence.


    • “You have no idea how to read it, or understand it.”

      I would think that if the creator of the entire universe chose to communicate its wishes with its chosen people in a text, it would be done in a way that was easy to understand and easy to read. Nothing left to interpretation (God is not the author of confusion – 1Corinthians 14:33) However, if a great many human beings told fantastic tales that were passed down orally from generation to generation, and then decided to write it down much later, I think we would have exactly what we have…The Bible.

      Maybe you have no idea how to read it (critically), maybe you do not understand it (probable fiction).