Without evidence of benefit, an intervention should not be presumed to be beneficial or safe.

- Rogue Medic

What is this Dangerous Treatment and How Long Did it Take to Stop Using it

This seems horrible.

How could any doctor ever fall for such harmful treatment?

What is this Dangerous Treatment?

How Long Did it Take to Stop Using it?

What we have learnt from the experience of the last few years is, that a great number of cases- which our predecessors thought and taught would die without Treatment X, may be spared Treatment X and yet live; and also, that many of the severe symptoms and risks in these cases were in reality the symptoms and risks arising out of Treatment X.[1]

What is Treatment X?

How could anyone think that a treatment was actually saving lives, when it was having the opposite effect?


Image credit.

Many of those who habitually practised Treatment X as a daily means of cure in the last generation were careful and shrewd observers, as is shown by their writings; and it seems scarcely possible that such men should have been utterly mistaken in assigning advantages to this powerful means of modifying vital actions. It would be more reasonable to conclude that the advantages must be very great to have blinded their eyes to the accompanying evils.[1]

Maybe there were some advantages, but what were they?

Or were the advantages just examples of cognitive dissonance?[2]

Defined either by a symptomatic or an anatomical nomenclature, every class of disease, in which Treatment X was put through the test ofexperience, was injured by it.[1]

The evidence of harm is irrefutable

What is Treatment X?

The answer is here.

Footnotes:

[1] ?

[2] Cognitive dissonance
Wikipedia
Article

.

Comments

  1. Blood letting as a means to remove evil bodily humors that accumulate and manifest as a myriad of disease processes. E.G. Malaria, TB, Polio, Cancer among others…

  2. Spinal immobilization for all! Bow at the altar of Stout, Johnny, and Roy!

  3. blood letting?

    doesn’t really sound pharmacological

  4. Lobotomies?