Without evidence of benefit, an intervention should not be presumed to be beneficial or safe.

- Rogue Medic

How the JPM failure of risk management is very EMS

JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) has reported to shareholders that they had a loss of $2 billion on a hedge that didn’t work. 😳

A hedge?

The FBI joins the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and regulators in Britain in investigating the loss on trades meant to help protect JPMorgan against credit risk. Instead, the complex trades backfired, causing a huge hit to the bank’s bottom line and its reputation.[1]

The more complex things are, the more things that can go wrong. A contraption that is as complicated as a Rube Goldberg design is probably not going to increase safety. All it takes is an unforeseen change in one part to alter the results from success to embarrassment.


Image credit.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner on Tuesday called the loss a “failure of risk management.”[1]

Without enough oxygen, we will die. The loss is “failure of risk management.” These statements are correct, but they do not tell us anything we do not already know. Who loses a couple of billion dollars without some sort of failure of risk management?

The ability of JPMorgan and the financial system to withstand the loss showed that reforms put in place after the 2008 financial crisis have worked, particularly the requirement for banks to hold more cash in reserve, Geithner said during an appearance at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s 2012 Fiscal Summit.[1]

Really?

Would this have caused JPM to fail if this had happened in 2007?

Based on what?

What if JPM put more money into this hedge out of a false sense of security provided by these new regulations?

Or is this just another example of the banks doing the same thing we do in EMS?

We often misunderstand the risks we take.

The magic phone call to medical command for permission to give a treatment is a perfect example of misunderstanding risk. This requirement encourages medical directors to authorize dangerous paramedics to treat patients out of the mistaken belief that They have to call to do anything dangerous. As if dangerous people are limited in the ways they can be dangerous.

Or the paramedics who just want to know how to avoid getting in trouble. They aren’t concerned for the patient. They are more interested in creating an alibi. How can I avoid responsibility? Is this the way to provide good patient care.

JPM appears to have misunderstood the risks they were taking. The guy at the top is at least giving the appearance of taking responsibility, rather than making an announcement that The usual scapegoats have been fired, so that the management does not have to accept responsibility or make any substantial changes. 🙄

As media reports surfaced about the chief investment office in early April, Jamie Dimon, the bank’s chief executive, publicly played down the concerns, calling them a “complete tempest in a teapot.”

After Mr. Dimon and other senior executive learned more, he sounded a more contrite tone. On Thursday, when disclosing the loss in a conference call with analysts, Mr. Dimon acknowledged that the bank had made “egregious mistakes.[2]

J.P. Morgan’s Chief Executive James Dimon told convened shareholders the trades leading to billions in losses at the bank were “flawed, complex, poorly conceived, poorly vetted and poorly executed.”[3]

“This should never have happened,” Dimon said at the meeting. “I can’t justify it. Unfortunately, these mistakes were self-inflicted.”[3]

J.P. Morgan’s losses have raised questions about the need for greater regulatory oversight and the bank’s stance on financial reform. Dimon said the bank supported “70% to 80%” of the Dodd-Frank financial-reform law and is “not against new regulations.”

“We do continue to believe in the importance of being able to hedge risk as an institution,” he said. “However, we also understand the need for rules and practices to ensure that hedging doesn’t morph into something different. What this hedge morphed into violates our own principles.”[3]

Footnotes:

[1] FBI opens inquiry into JPMorgan Chase $2 billion trading loss
By Richard A. Serrano and Jim Puzzanghera
May 15, 2012, 10:20 a.m.
LA Times
Article

[2] F.B.I. Begins Preliminary Inquiry Into JPMorgan
May 15, 2012, 12:37 PM
Legal/Regulatory
by Ben Protess
NY Times DealBook
Article

[3] 2nd UPDATE: JP Morgan’s Dimon: Hedge ‘Should Never Have Happened’
May 15, 2012, 1:15 p.m. ET
By Erik Holm and Christian Berthelsen
Wall Street Journal
Article

.