Without evidence of benefit, an intervention should not be presumed to be beneficial or safe.

- Rogue Medic

The Main Stream Media and Superstition


Tomb of Lazarus image credit.
 

This sad story is resulting in a lot of promotion of superstition.

A girl went in for a routine operation and died.

My condolences go out to the family.
 

The mother of a 13-year-old Northern California girl declared brain dead after a routine tonsillectomy says her daughter had expressed fears she wouldn’t wake up after the surgery.[1]

 

This is the kind of comment that people will use to promote the superstition of precognition and other psychic powers.

Did she know what was going to happen?

No.

Did she worry about what was going to happen?

Yes, it is what people do. We worry.

Is there any connection between that worry and the outcome?

There is no reason to believe that there is any connection.
 

The family claim to need time for a miracle.
 

“The medicine has not worked. It’s time to let God work,” said Omari Sealy, McMath’s uncle. “We are calling on God and calling on our faith.”[2]

 

How much time does it take for a miracle?

Since miracles defy the laws of nature, no time would be needed.

Why is life support needed for a miracle?

Since miracles defy the laws of nature, no life support would be needed.

No time or equipment is needed for a miracle.

Only a suspension of the laws of nature is needed for a miracle, so depriving other children of the care that could be provided by the staff and equipment devoted to this brain dead child is not necessary.

What is the history of miraculous recovery from death?

Lazarus and Jesus.

What kind of life support did they have?

None.

Take a look at the picture. A morgue is more high tech than that tomb.

What kind of legal injunction did they require?

None.

Both were buried in tombs.

The family could make an arrangement with a mortuary to wait for a miracle, but they should not interfere with the care of other patients who are not dead.
 

Is that cold?

Does the belief in miracles depend on the use of medicine?

Medicine cannot do anything for brain death, so requiring the use of medicine is of no benefit to the child.

Being cold allows other children to receive the care that could be provided by the staff and equipment devoted to this brain dead child.

This family is going through something no family should go through, but they are increasing the likelihood of another family having a bad outcome by depriving other patients of care.

Miracles are not a part of medicine.

Footnotes:

[1] California girl had fears before tonsil surgery
By Associated Press,
Updated: Friday, December 20, 12:01 PM
Washington Post
Health & Science
Article

[2] Family of Comatose Teen Battles Hospital for ‘Time to Let God Work’
Dec. 18, 2013
By Colleen Curry
Good Morning America
Article

.

Comments

  1. It is especially infuriating that a judge has overridden the clinical decision-making of the hospital staff on this issue. The child is not “on life support”. She is dead, and her corpse is consuming astonishing levels of resources (which, based on experience, are unlikely to be compensated). A knowledgable judge would never order a hospital to continue doing CPR for days at a stretch; this is no different.

    • PJ,

      It is especially infuriating that a judge has overridden the clinical decision-making of the hospital staff on this issue.

      When faced with a medical decision, judges tend to favor life, or what appears to be life, based on a lack of understanding of what life is.

      The child is not “on life support”.

      She is on vital signs support, which is not the same as life support in any accurate way.

      She is dead, and her corpse is consuming astonishing levels of resources

      And this is where the choice in favor of life that is not life is a choice against real life.

      A knowledgable judge would never order a hospital to continue doing CPR for days at a stretch; this is no different.

      Exactly.

      This is not different from hooking up a CPR machine and claiming that the patient is alive.

      Some anticoagulant might need to be given to maintain the appearance of life processes, but legal distinction between alive and dead is brain.

      Brain death is death, no matter how much new age people like Dr. Sanjay Gupta try to pretend otherwise.

      The brain might have some gradual healing of damage due to trauma, infection, alcoholism, et cetera, but that is only in a brain that is still functioning.

      Her brain is not functioning.

      Her heart beat is not a sign of brain function, since the heart initiates its own activity.

      Her lack of respiratory drive is one of the signs of brain death.

      The problem is this –

      We know this because we understand the medicine involved.

      They believe otherwise because they do not understand the medicine involved.

      Without understanding, there is no ability to recognize what is truly impossible.

      A bumblebee does not fly because it does not know that it is violating the laws of aerodynamics.

      A bumblebee flies because the critics of aerodynamics do not understand that the bumblebee is demonstrating the laws of aerodynamics.

      How many patients will need to be diverted, or boarded in the ED, or transferred, because of a lack of a bed in the ICU?

      How many more patients survive cardiac arrest now that we do not transport every cardiac arrest patient?

      .