Without evidence of benefit, an intervention should not be presumed to be beneficial or safe.

- Rogue Medic

Shooting the messenger isn’t going to change the science – Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part IV

Bill Nye was interviewed on CNN about his video Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children. He states –

If you had a political faction that insisted that we teach that the world is flat, and it’s a conspiracy of scientists and others who publish these pictures where the world was round. After a while, people would insist that you not teach that anymore.[1]

Teaching Creationism, because a lot of people believe in Creationism, is as wrong as teaching that the Earth is flat, just because a lot of people believe the Earth is flat. Science can show that the Earth is spherical. Science can demonstrate that evolution is real.
 


Image source. Click on image to make it larger.
 

The interviewer asked Bill Nye some questions about Creationism.

What is the harm in learning the Bible’s Creation story?

Nye – Learning the story is fine. That’s great, but it’s not science. Tax dollars used for science education shouldn’t be used to teach Creationism as an alternative. Creationism is not right.

Is science whatever we want it to be?

Well, . . . .

Is math whatever we want it to be?

Is English whatever we want it to be?
 

Are you worried, Bill, in any way? I mean you’re taking on a lot of people here, that it’s an emotional, sometimes passionate subject, that people are going to turn away, turn away from you as The Science Guy, turn away from some of the things that you are pointing out, that you want people to pay attention to?

I follow you. I know just what you mean, but shooting the messenger isn’t going to change the science,

If the message is valid, and evolution is valid, then the alternative to intelligent criticism is to attack the messenger. Intelligent criticism would be to find flaws in the message, if they exist, and if they are significant.

That would require an understanding of science. Being intelligent seems like too much work, let’s just attack the messenger.
 

Why do you suppose that that belief persists?

Nye – It’s troubling. I guess because people like me have not done their job.

And because plenty of people discourage us from understanding science.

We would be justifiably embarrassed to be illiterate, but many of us appear to be proud of our ignorance of science.

This is blissful ignorance and it is not good.

The interview –

[youtube]-TD1rTsJ8E4[/youtube]

Unfortunately, the video does not appear to be available any more.
 

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part I

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part II

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part III

Shooting the messenger isn’t going to change the science – Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part IV

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part V

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part VI

Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part VII

The Age of the Earth – Do Creationists have any clue about science? Part VIII

Footnotes:

[1] Bill Nye on creationism: It’s like teaching the earth is flat
Dan Gilgoff – CNN Belief Blog Co-Editor
August 31st, 2012 03:24 PM ET
Article with CNN video

.